Industrial Design · Product · DFM — 2022

Project 261 —
THUDPUK

A low-cost flying toy engineered for injection moulding. Thirty prototypes in three days. Production-ready design.

Studio

TwoSix Design, Aberdeen

Role

Product Designer — Intern

Discipline

Industrial Design · CAD · DFM · Rapid Prototyping

Year

2022

The problem

A flying toy has to be aerodynamic and cheap to injection-mould, and the geometry that makes one true tends to make the other impossible.

What I made

A radially symmetric form that flies by symmetry rather than by wing profile — so the tooling stays simple.

What made it hard

The whole project is one tension held in tooling. Every constraint below pulls against flight, and none of them was negotiable.

Flight Thin asymmetric profiles, complex curvature and variable cross-sections are what fly well
Moulding Those are exactly the properties that make injection moulding expensive or impossible
Material Recycled plastic, with tooling cost recoverable at a realistic batch
Branding TwoSix identity resolved into the surface without adding tooling complexity

The turn

Symmetry is the manufacturing shortcut

Early testing showed that radially symmetric forms — discs, rings, boomerang profiles — reach consistent flight through symmetry alone, without the complex asymmetric wing profile a traditional frisbee needs. Symmetry cuts the number of variables, simplifies the tooling geometry and makes flight predictable at the same time. After that every formal decision had one of two jobs: improve flight, or make the mould cheaper. Anything that helped one and hurt the other had to earn its place through testing rather than assumption.

THUDPUK final Keyshot render — recycled plastic boomerang-form flying toy with TwoSix branding
01

Research & Ideation

Early exploration mapped how changes in geometry affected flight — edge thickness, chord width, weight distribution, spin axis. Collaborative sketching with the team ran alongside solo CAD modelling to test assumptions before committing to physical material. The goal was to fail fast and cheaply — in software, not plastic.

02

Rapid Prototyping — 30+ forms in 3 days

3D printing in PLA was the test bed. Over 30 prototypes across three days — each one a small variation in profile, edge taper, or diameter. Testing with university students and staff assessed flight consistency, catchability, and safety. Not a lab test — just repeated throws across a corridor, which is exactly the use case. Insights from each throw fed back directly into the next CAD iteration.

03

CAD Refinement & DFM

As the form converged, CAD geometry was reworked for injection moulding. Undercuts removed. Part geometry simplified. Wall thicknesses rationalised to maintain structural integrity while minimising material use. The brand mark was resolved into a surface feature that didn't require a separate tool insert. Each change was checked against both flight test data and mould cost logic.

04

Final Render & Handover

High-resolution KeyShot renders and fully resolved CAD files were prepared to communicate design intent to a toolmaker. These were the production-ready deliverables — everything a manufacturer needed to start cutting tool steel. The studio closed before that conversation took place.

Manufacturing Constraints — every decision filtered through these

Recycled plastic only — material cost ceiling tied to £10 retail

1–2 part injection mould — no side actions, no undercuts

Simple, symmetric geometry — manufacturable without specialist tooling

Safe flight path — no sharp edges, consistent behaviour for casual users

Brand integration — resolved into surface geometry, no added tooling cost

THUDPUK very early ideation — pencil sketches exploring flying toy archetypes Sketch 01 — initial ideation
THUDPUK refined sketch — flight profile and edge taper exploration Refined sketch — flight profile
THUDPUK outdoor sketch and test — annotated field notes during flight testing Field sketch — outdoor testing
THUDPUK Rhino CAD — boomerang profile development with edge taper specifications CAD — boomerang profile
THUDPUK mortise and tenon pin joint detail — modular assembly study CAD — pin joint detail
THUDPUK 30 slot iteration — DFM exploration for branding and surface features CAD — branding integration
THUDPUK PLA prototypes — full batch from three days of 3D printing PLA — full prototype batch
THUDPUK PLA prototypes — discus-form variations testing aerodynamic profiles PLA — form variations
THUDPUK PLA prototypes — late-stage profiles approaching final form PLA — late-stage iterations
THUDPUK final form in hand — surface and weight in real-world context In hand — final form
THUDPUK final form — alternate view showing branding integration In hand — branding
THUDPUK final form — edge profile and material finish detail In hand — edge profile
The shapes that fly well are exactly the shapes that make injection moulding expensive. The project was about resolving that. — Project 261, TwoSix Design, 2022

Studio context: TwoSix Design closed due to financial difficulties before THUDPUK entered production. The design reached production-ready stage — resolved CAD, KeyShot renders, DFM-compliant geometry, brand integration complete. The same internship also delivered Project 262 — Greene King Ceramics, a 40-unit slip-cast tableware commission completed within the same period.

Brief Low-cost flying toy. £10 retail. Recycled plastic. Injection mould, 1–2 parts. Safe, consistent flight.
Role Research, ideation, CAD development, rapid prototyping, DFM engineering, render delivery.
Prototyping 30+ PLA 3D-printed forms over 3 days. Informal user testing with staff and students.
CAD Full 3D model refined for injection moulding. Undercuts removed, geometry simplified, brand mark integrated.
Renders High-resolution KeyShot outputs prepared for tooling conversation and client presentation.
Outcome Production-ready design. Studio closed before manufacture commenced due to financial difficulties.
Studio TwoSix Design, Aberdeen — Product Design Internship, 2022.

Where it landed

The final form hit the brief — manufacturable geometry, predictable flight, and TwoSix branding resolved into the surface with no additional tooling complexity. High-resolution CAD and KeyShot renders were prepared to support tooling conversations. The design was production-ready; TwoSix Design folded due to financial difficulty before it got there.

What it unblocked

The symmetry finding is the transferable part, and it outlived the studio. It converts an aerodynamics problem into a tooling problem with fewer variables — a rule, not a result — and it applies to any spun or thrown toy that has to survive a real mould-cost conversation.

Related Project

Project 262 — Greene King